Talk:Working groups/branding

From Habari Project

< Talk:Working groups
Revision as of 12:41, 31 July 2008 by skippy (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm interested in joining this WG. --arthus 19:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

A suggestion for creating bullet lists of features when discussing Habari: list the feature first, and then describe it after. If you look right now at the main HP.o site, there is a snippet of the 0.5 release announcement. The first three bullet points, while maybe a little wordier than is necessary, all convey pretty quickly a new feature. The fourth bullet, however, starts off talking about current features as a lead-in for the new PostgreSQL support. I think that sentence should be reverse, to list PostgresSQL support first, and then mention that we now support 3 DB platforms.

If we can consistently follow this model when speaking about Habari features (on hp.o, in emails, in comments on other sites) we'll make sure that the good stuff is presented first, making it easier for readers to skim looking for the features about which they care the most. skippy 12:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools